California Supreme Court Clarifies the “Continuous Accrual” Exception to the Statute of Limitations, Expanding the Ability of Plaintiffs to Sue
in Civil Litigation by Stephen Raucher
On January 24, 2013, the California Supreme Court decided the case Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc., 55 Cal. 4th 1185 (2013), and clarified the common law theory of continuous accrual as it pertains to statutes of limitation. The Court … more
Evidence of Fraudulent Statements At Variance With Contractual Language Allowed by New California Supreme Court Case
in Civil Litigation by Stephen Raucher
The California Supreme Court recently decided Riverisland Cold Storage, Inc. v. Fresno-Madera Production Credit Association, 55 Cal.4th 1169 (2013), and changed the fraud exception to the parol evidence rule. The Court departed from the highly criticized Pendergrass rule, which took … more
Prosecuting Edwards but not Lehman Brothers?
in Civil Litigation by Timothy Reuben
Reuben Raucher & Blum attorney Timothy D. Reuben’s article, “Prosecuting Edwards but not Lehman Brothers?” is published in the Los Angeles Daily Journal on April 30, 2012. Click here to read the article.
Anthony Pellicano Strikes Again and Lawyers Are the Losers
in Civil Litigation by Timothy Reuben
Reuben Raucher & Blum attorney Timothy D. Reuben’s article, “Anthony Pellicano Strikes Again and Lawyers Are the Losers” is published in the Los Angeles Daily Journal on April 5, 2011.
A Profound Blow Against Arbitration
in Civil Litigation by Timothy Reuben
Reuben Raucher & Blum attorney Timothy Reuben’s article, “A Profound Blow Against Arbitration“, is published in the Los Angeles Daily Journal on October 21, 2010.
Suing Lawyers for Conspiring with Their Clients Just Got Easier
in Civil Litigation by Timothy Reuben
Reuben Raucher & Blum attorney Timothy Reuben’s article, “Suing Lawyers for Conspiring with Their Clients Just Got Easier” is published in the Los Angeles Daily Journal on September 22, 2010.
Corporate Counsel Clarity: 9th Circuit Defines the Client
in Civil Litigation by Timothy Reuben
Reuben Raucher & Blum attorney Timothy Reuben’s article, “Corporate Counsel Clarity: 9th Circuit Defines the Client” is published in the Los Angeles Daily Journal on July 26, 2010.
Supreme Court SLAPPS for Lawyers
in Civil Litigation by Timothy Reuben
Reuben Raucher & Blum attorney Timothy Reuben’s article, “Supreme Court SLAPPS for Lawyers” is published in the Los Angeles Daily Journal on June 4, 2010.
Inadvertent Disclosure
in Civil Litigation by Timothy Reuben
Reuben Raucher & Blum attorney Timothy Reuben’s article, “Inadvertent Disclosure” is published in the March 2010 issue of California Lawyer.
Vacating Arbitration Awards, Now Less Daunting of a Task?
in Civil Litigation by Stephen Raucher
Reuben Raucher & Blum attorney Stephen Raucher’s article, co-authored with Matthew Bartek, “Vacating Arbitration Awards, Now Less Daunting of a Task?” is published in the Los Angeles Daily Journal on December 9, 2009.
Class Action Fraud Takes the “Class” Out of the Legal Profession
in Civil Litigation by Timothy Reuben
Reuben Raucher & Blum attorney Timothy Reuben’s article, “Class Action Fraud Takes the ‘Class’ Out of the Legal Profession“, is published in the Los Angeles Daily Journal on June 27, 2008.
Fee for Few
in Civil Litigation by Timothy Reuben
Reuben Raucher & Blum attorney Timothy Reuben’s article, “Fee for Few,” is published in the Los Angeles Daily Journal on February 28, 2008.
Navigating Malpractice Liability
in Civil Litigation by Timothy Reuben
Reuben Raucher & Blum attorney Stephen Raucher’s article “Navigating Malpractice Liability“, co-authored with Matthew Bartek, is published in the Los Angeles Daily Journal on December 20,2007.
Legal Malpractice: Court Must Decide for Whom Statute Tolls
in Civil Litigation by Stephen Raucher
Reuben Raucher & Blum attorney Stephen Raucher’s article, “Legal Malpractice: Court Must Decide for Whom Statute Tolls“, published in the Los Angeles Daily Journal on June 15, 2006